Home » Archive by categoryReverse Domain Name Hijacking (Page 4)

Doctrine of lashes : UDRP delivers new strict punishment for RDNH

If an overly aggressive corporation tries to steal your long-held domain, a new provision under the UDRP will ensure severe punishment. A finding of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking for aged domains is about to receive an expanded outcome for the Complainant. “We’re dealing with mega corporations that will not pay fair price for domains registered […]

Copyright DomainGang

Continue reading

HugeDomains gets Reverse Domain Name Hijacking win

Complainants first tried to buy domain before filing UDRP. FPT Industrie S.p.a. and REM Industrie S.r.l. have been found to have engaged in reverse domain name hijacking in a domain dispute they brought against domain investor HugeDomains. The companies, which use the domain fptfastmill.com, filed a UDRP with World Intellectual Property Organization for the domain […]

The post HugeDomains gets Reverse Domain Name Hijacking win appeared first on Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News & Views.

Continue reading

HugeDomains : UDRP against FastMill.com ends with RDNH finding

HugeDomains has fought off the UDRP brought against one of its domains, FastMill.com, and the decision was sealed with a finding of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking. The Complainants are FPT Industrie S.p.a. of Italy and REM Industrie S.r.l. of Italy, represented by Brioschi IP, Italy. According to the UDRP: “Complainant holds registered rights in the […]

Copyright DomainGang

Continue reading

Pilotfish.com : Three member panel delivers finding of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in UDRP

The domain PilotFish.com was challenged via the UDRP process; the Complainant is Pilotfish Networks AB of Göteborg, Sweden, represented by Ports Group AB, Sweden. They operate Pilotfish.se. A three member panel at the WIPO, found the Complainant guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking, for challenging this 2001 domain registration. “The Panel finds that the decision […]

Copyright DomainGang

Continue reading

Misled panel finds reverse domain name hijacking

Panelist used the wrong dates in finding RDNH, but the complainant might not have known. A single-member National Arbitration Forum panel has found Tupelo Honey Hospitality Corporation to have engaged in reverse domain name hijacking for filing a cybersquatting dispute against TupeloHoney.com. Panelist M. Kelly Tillery found in the complainant’s favor for the first two […]

The post Misled panel finds reverse domain name hijacking appeared first on Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News & Views.

Continue reading

Reverse domain name hijacking in Dermarose.com case

Self-represented domain owner didn’t request RDNH finding but panelist granted it. Brand Development Corp of Miami, Florida has been found to have engaged in reverse domain name hijacking in a cybersquatting dispute it brought against the owner of dermarose.com, dermarose.info, dermarose.net and dermarose.org. Brand Development Corp has a skincare line called Dermarose and uses the […]

The post Reverse domain name hijacking in Dermarose.com case appeared first on Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News & Views.

Continue reading

Normann Copenhagen and DLA Piper team up in bad reverse domain hijacking case

With help of well-known law firm, furniture company tries to take Normann.com away from guy whose last name is Normann. Normann Copenhagen ApS, a seller of Scandinavian furniture, has been found guilty of reverse domain name hijacking over the domain name Normann.com. This is a really, really bad case of reverse domain name hijacking. It’s […]

The post Normann Copenhagen and DLA Piper team up in bad reverse domain hijacking case appeared first on Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News & Views.

Continue reading