“Net Neutrality” Protects New Monopolies from Old

CircleID CircleID: Over the next decade which companies do you think will be better able to exercise monopoly power? Amazon, T&T, Comcast, Facebook, Google, Regional phone companies, or Verizon?

If you'd asked me this question in 2000, I would've picked AT&T, Comcast, Verizon, and regional phone companies. They are part of local duopolies for wired infrastructure. They had a comfortable relationship with the FCC which regulated them nationally and with most of the state regulators. They saw the Internet as potentially disruptive and would've preferred to have its potential for innovation slowed by regulation. Amazon and Google (and most of the Internet community of the day) were against FCC regulation of the Internet exactly because that would chill innovation.

The Internet won; the FCC chose only the lightest of regulation. We got innovation; Facebook and Twitter happened; Google and Amazon grew enormously.

And then guess what. In 2014 at the urging of Google, Amazon, and the rest of the Internet establishment, the FCC decided it needed to regulate the Internet after all. In an Orwellian twist, this regulation was given the attractive name of Net Neutrality. Its stated purpose is to protect us from abuses that AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and the like "might" commit.

Are the telcos more powerful than they were in 2000? Of course not; even their landline duopolies are less powerful as more and more last mile access to content is wireless and wireless becomes more and more competitive.

Are Google and Amazon more in need of protection now than they were then? Sounds absurd but they're the establishment now. They are strong enough so they can't be toppled by smaller competitors with the same products. The only commercial threat to them — as it always is with dominant players — is disruptive innovation. And what better way to slow innovation than regulation? Note also that regulation is usually favored by those who think they can control the regulators (telcos in 2000; dominant Internet players in 2014).

"Net Neutraility" forbids telcos for charging content providers a premium for "fast lanes". But Google, Amazon, et al already have private fast lanes and local data centers and data caches so that their content can reach consumers faster than content from anyone else. Conveniently Net Neutrality regs don't cover the private internet expressways. In fact if you pay Amazon to host your site, you too can have a fast lane. But you can't buy that fast lane from AT&T ala carte without the hosting because they're not allowed to sell it.

What if someone were to provide a drone-mesh-based fast lane and charge more the faster you want your content to go? Would that be a threat to us? No. Would it be a threat to Amazon and Google? A little; it might be disruptive. Better, in their minds, to subject that service to the strait jacket of regulation. What if telemedicine requires a guaranteed faster service than the public Internet provides? Does it just have to wait until the whole Internet gets faster to start saving lives? Why shouldn't AT&T or the drone-based ISP be able to sell the faster service at a premium?

If all the ins-and-outs of the Net Neutrality debate are hard to follow, just ask yourself in 2017 if Google's search dominance is more of a present danger than AT&T's eroding monopoly. I'm not for regulating Google or Amazon purely because of their size; but I'm certainly against regulation like so-called Net Neutrality which protects their dominance.
Written by Tom EvslinFollow CircleID on TwitterMore under: Access Providers, Broadband, Net Neutrality, Policy & Regulation

The post "Net Neutrality" Protects New Monopolies from Old appeared first on iGoldRush Domain News and Resources.

Continue reading

4 tips for hands-off domain management

Whats Your Name Whats Your Name: If you’re like us, you’re never exactly thrilled to spend your valuable time renewing domains, updating settings, and figuring out when your next expiration date will be. However, there are a few Name.com account settings that can make your domain management more of a pain-free process. Enable automatic renewal Have a product or domain that […]
The post 4 tips for hands-off domain management appeared first on Name.com Blog.

The post 4 tips for hands-off domain management appeared first on iGoldRush Domain News and Resources.

Continue reading

AUCTION RECAP OF JULY 13, 2017

A comprehensive look at the final auction prices, closeouts and more from the auction list posted on July 13, 2017. 

If there is an asterisk (*) next to a price, it means that the name was at auction from a private seller (rather than an expiring name) and may have had a reserve.  I’m only showing where the price was when the auction ended, but the name may not have sold if a reserve was in place.

Save Money With Daddy Bulk Domain Registration

Namejet

Top 10 Namejet sales for yesterday as listed on Namebio.

jlz.com $24,190
nerdvana.com $11,600
jewo.com $3,100
hoffa.com $2,500
dig.org $2,001
theflashblog.com $1,760
careercc.com $1,510
35896.com $1,422
63951.com $1,222
dqwl.com $1,020

The post AUCTION RECAP OF JULY 13, 2017 appeared first on DSAD.

Continue reading