BEDS.COM: ‘Wilful Blindness’ Only Applies to Distinctive Marks You may recall that I have from time to time focused on what it takes to demonstrate acquired distinctiveness or a “secondary meaning” in an otherwise descriptive or generic term. This issue has again arisen in this case because the Complainant alleged common law trademark rights in BEDS.COM due to an “extensive …
The post BEDS.COM: ‘Wilful Blindness’ Only Applies to Distinctive Marks – vol. 3.44 appeared first on InternetCommerce.org.
